An Employer Mandate for Wellness
By Lin Grensing-Pophal
From Human Resource Executive Online on Monday, February 1, 2016
Meanwhile, this case is not very representative of most employer plans, says Steve Wojcik, vice president of public policy at the National Business Group on Health in Washington, because most wellness incentives are well below the 30-percent level permitted by the Affordable Care Act.
"Even as this case winds its way through the courts and Flambeau succeeds," he says, "I don't think many employers would need to restructure their wellness plans."
Given that, most HR departments may not need to take any action, other than to be aware of additional cases or a potential appeal of the EEOC v. Flambeau district-court case, he says.
"Employers need to know how the safe-harbor language applies to wellness programs," he says. "They need to know what it means to collect medical-related information from employees. Clarification will be important."
- Proposals for Taxing Health Benefits
- Health Care Spending Growth Accelerates
- What the Trump Election Means for ACA
- State Exchange Premiums
- Anti-Inflammatory Specialty Drugs
- Value-Based Contracts for Specialty Drugs
- Drug Pricing
- Big Data and Personalized Communications
- Linking Well-being to Business Performance
- August 2015 Cadillac Tax Update
- National Health Expenditures
- New Blockbuster Cholesterol Drugs
- Domestic Partner Coverage
- Update on Cadillac Tax
- Mental Health
- Cadillac Tax
- Site of Care
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- National Health Spending Growth
- Federally Run Exchange Subsidies
- 2015 Rise in Health Care Costs
- Bundled Payments
- Specialty Pharmaceuticals